Ações governamentais para controle e prevenção da COVID-19 em prisões: uma revisão de escopo / Government actions for COVID-19 control and prevention in prisons: a scoping review

Resumo Trata-se de uma revisão de escopo da literatura sobre as ações adotadas pelos países, durante o ano de 2020, para o cuidado das pessoas que vivenciam o ambiente prisional durante a pandemia de COVID-19. Selecionamos 54 publicações para extração de dados, encontrando dados de 45 países, que foram organizados em categorias. A maior parte das publicações abordava as estratégias adotadas pelos países de economia avançada. Todas as publicações citavam alguma estratégia destinada a reduzir a transmissão viral - as principais foram a restrição/suspensão da visitação de familiares e o desencarceramento - e intervenções relativas à melhoria da infraestrutura nas prisões, sendo mais citada a disponibilização de telefone e/ou outro dispositivo para chamadas ou videochamadas. As políticas destinadas à mitigação das consequências da epidemia e das intervenções foram encontradas em publicações referentes a 33 países, sendo mais abordada a manutenção do contato familiar e a revisão da política de segurança pública. Em relação às políticas de governança, foram relatadas ações de 11 países, sendo a mais citada o fortalecimento da autoridade nacional. Este estudo aponta para a necessidade de pesquisas a respeito do sucesso de cada estratégia e das diferenças entre os países.

Abstract This is a scoping review of the literature on actions taken by countries during 2020 regarding the care for people living in the prison environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. We selected 54 publications for data mining and found data from 45 countries, which were organized into categories. Most of the literature addressed strategies adopted by countries with advanced economies. All of them mentioned some strategies to reduce viral transmission - the major ones were restricted/suspended family visits and desincarceration - and interventions to improve infrastructures in prisons, the provision of a telephone or other devices for calls or video calls being the most mentioned. Policies to mitigate the effects of the epidemic and interventions were found in publications referencing 33 countries, with the main focus on keeping family contact and reviewing the public safety policy. Concerning governance policies, measures from 11 countries were reported, and the most cited was national authority reinforcement. This study highlights the need for research on the success of each strategy and the differences among those countries.

Government actions for COVID-19 control and prevention in prisons: a scoping review. / Ações governamentais para controle e prevenção da COVID-19 em prisões: uma revisão de escopo.

This is a scoping review of the literature on actions taken by countries during 2020 regarding the care for people living in the prison environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. We selected 54 publications for data mining and found data from 45 countries, which were organized into categories. Most of the literature addressed strategies adopted by countries with advanced economies. All of them mentioned some strategies to reduce viral transmission - the major ones were restricted/suspended family visits and desincarceration - and interventions to improve infrastructures in prisons, the provision of a telephone or other devices for calls or video calls being the most mentioned. Policies to mitigate the effects of the epidemic and interventions were found in publications referencing 33 countries, with the main focus on keeping family contact and reviewing the public safety policy. Concerning governance policies, measures from 11 countries were reported, and the most cited was national authority reinforcement. This study highlights the need for research on the success of each strategy and the differences among those countries.

Trata-se de uma revisão de escopo da literatura sobre as ações adotadas pelos países, durante o ano de 2020, para o cuidado das pessoas que vivenciam o ambiente prisional durante a pandemia de COVID-19. Selecionamos 54 publicações para extração de dados, encontrando dados de 45 países, que foram organizados em categorias. A maior parte das publicações abordava as estratégias adotadas pelos países de economia avançada. Todas as publicações citavam alguma estratégia destinada a reduzir a transmissão viral - as principais foram a restrição/suspensão da visitação de familiares e o desencarceramento - e intervenções relativas à melhoria da infraestrutura nas prisões, sendo mais citada a disponibilização de telefone e/ou outro dispositivo para chamadas ou videochamadas. As políticas destinadas à mitigação das consequências da epidemia e das intervenções foram encontradas em publicações referentes a 33 países, sendo mais abordada a manutenção do contato familiar e a revisão da política de segurança pública. Em relação às políticas de governança, foram relatadas ações de 11 países, sendo a mais citada o fortalecimento da autoridade nacional. Este estudo aponta para a necessidade de pesquisas a respeito do sucesso de cada estratégia e das diferenças entre os países.

Incorporated antivirals for chronic hepatitis B in Brazil: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different drug therapies for chronic hepatitis B in adult patients. METHODS: Using a Markov model, a hypothetical cohort of 40 years for HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative patients was constructed. Adefovir, entecavir, tenofovir and lamivudine (with rescue therapy in cases of viral resistance) were compared for treating adult patients with chronic hepatitis B undergoing treatment for the first time, with high levels of alanine aminotransferase, no evidence of cirrhosis and without HIV co-infection. Values for cost and effect were obtained from the literature, and expressed in effect on life years (LY). A discount rate of 5% was applied. Univariate sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess model uncertainties. RESULTS: Initial treatment with entecavir or tenofovir showed better clinical outcomes. The lowest cost-effectiveness ratio was for entecavir in HBeAg-positive patients (R$ 4,010.84/LY) and lamivudine for HBeAg-negative patients (R$ 6,205.08/LY). For HBeAg-negative patients, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of entecavir (R$ 14,101.05/LY) is below the threshold recommended by the World Health Organization. Sensitivity analysis showed that variation in the cost of drugs may make tenofovir a cost-effective alternative for both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Entecavir is the recommended alternative to start treating patients with chronic hepatitis B in Brazil. However, if there is a reduction in the cost of tenofovir, it can become a cost-effective alternative.

Análise de custo-efetividade dos imunossupressores utilizados no tratamento de manutenção do transplante renal em pacientes adultos no Brasil / Cost-effectiveness analysis of immunosuppressive drugs in post-renal transplantation maintenance therapy in adult patients in Brazil / Coste-efectividad de los inmunosupresores utilizados en el tratamiento de mantenimiento por trasplante renal en pacientes adultos de Brasil

O objetivo do estudo foi realizar análise custoefetividade de imunossupressores utilizados na terapia de manutenção pós-transplante renal. Coorte hipotética de adultos transplantados foi acompanhada por 20 anos, empregando-se modelo de Markov. Os 10 esquemas terapêuticos avaliados continham prednisona (P). O custo médio dos medicamentos foi obtido na Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamentos. Outros custos assistenciais compuseram cada estágio da doença. O custo foi expresso em reais, a efetividade em anos de vida ganhos e adotou-se a perspectiva do sistema público de saúde. Ao fim do acompanhamento, a análise com desconto mostrou que todos os esquemas foram dominados por ciclosporina(CSA)+azatioprina(AZA) +P. Nas demais análises, tacrolimo+AZA+P não foi dominado, mas a relação custo-efetividade incremental entre estes dois esquemas foi de R$ 156.732,07/ anos de vida ganhos, na análise sem desconto, valor que ultrapassa o limiar de três vezes o PIB per capita brasileiro. Nenhuma alteração qualitativa foi demonstrada pela análise de sensibilidade e a probabilidade do esquema CSA+AZA+P ser o mais custo-efetivo é superior a 85%.

The aim of the study was to perform cost-effectiveness analysis of immunosuppressive drugs in post-renal transplantation maintenance therapy. A hypothetical cohort of transplanted adults was followed for 20 years, using the Markov model. The 10 evaluated therapeutic regimens contained prednisone (P). Average cost of the medicines was obtained from CMED (Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamentos). Other patient care costs were included in each disease stage. Costs were expressed in Brazilian reais, effectiveness was measured as years of life gained, and the study adopted a public health system perspective. At the end of follow-up, the analysis with discount showed that all the regimens were dominated by cyclosporine (CSA)+azathioprine (AZA)+P. In the remaining analyses, tacrolimus+AZA+P was not dominated, but the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between these two regimens was R$ 156,732.07/ years of life gained, a value that exceeds the threshold of three times the Brazilian per capita GDP. In the sensitivity analysis, no qualitative change was observed and the probability of CSA+AZA+P being the most cost-effective regimen was greater than 85%.

El objetivo del estudio fue el análisis del coste-efectividad de los inmunosupresores utilizados en el tratamiento de mantenimiento por trasplante renal. Una cohorte hipotética de adultos trasplantados tuvo un seguimiento durante 20 años, utilizando el modelo de Markov. Los 10 regímenes terapéuticos evaluados contienen prednisona (P). El coste promedio de los medicamentos se obtuvo de la CMED (Cámara de Regulación del Mercado de Medicamentos), asimismo, se incluyeron otros costes sanitarios. El coste se expresó en reales, eficacia en los años de vida ganados y adoptó la perspectiva del sistema sanitario público. Al final del periodo de seguimiento, el análisis demostró que todos los regímenes terapéuticos fueron dominados por cic losporina(CSA)+azatioprina(AZA)+P. En otros análisis, tacrolimus+AZA+P no fue dominante, pero la ratio coste-efectividad incremental entre estos dos regímenes fue de R$ 156.732,07/ años de vida ganados. Un valor que supera el umbral de tres veces el PIB per cápita brasileño. Análisis de sensibilidad: no se demostró ningún cambio cualitativo y la probabilidad de régimen CSA + AZA + P reflejó la mejor relación coste-beneficio (superior al 85%).

Antivirais incorporados no Brasil para hepatite B cronica: analise de custo-efetividade / Antivirales incorporados en Brasil para hepatitis B cronica: analisis de costo-efectividad / Incorporated antivirals for chronic hepatitis B in Brazil: a cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJETIVO Avaliar o custo-efetividade de diferentes tratamentos medicamentosos para hepatite B crônica entre pacientes adultos. MÉTODOS Utilizando modelo de Markov, construiu-se coorte hipotética de 40 anos para pacientes HBeAg-positivo ou HBeAg-negativo. Foram comparados os usos de adefovir, entecavir, tenofovir e lamivudina (com terapia de resgate em caso de resistência viral) para tratamento de pacientes adultos com hepatite B crônica, virgens de tratamento, com elevados níveis de alanina aminotransferase, sem evidência de cirrose e sem coinfecção por HIV. Valores para custo e efeito foram obtidos da literatura. A medida do efeito foi expressa em anos de vida ganhos (AVG). Taxa de desconto de 5% foi aplicada. Análise de sensibilidade univariada foi conduzida para avaliar incertezas do modelo. RESULTADOS O tratamento inicial com entecavir ou tenofovir apresentou melhores resultados clínicos. As menores razões custo-efetividade foram de entecavir para pacientes HBeAg-positivo (R$ 4.010,84/AVG) e lamivudina para pacientes HBeAg-negativo (R$ 6.205,08/AVG). Para pacientes HBeAg-negativo, a razão custo-efetividade incremental de entecavir (R$ 14.101,05/AVG) está abaixo do limiar recomendado pela Organização Mundial da Saúde. Análise de sensibilidade mostrou que variação nos custos dos medicamentos pode tornar tenofovir alternativa custo-efetiva tanto para pacientes HBeAg-positivo quanto para HBeAg-negativo. CONCLUSÕES Entecavir é alternativa recomendada para iniciar o tratamento de pacientes com hepatite B crônica no Brasil. Contudo, se houver redução no custo de tenofovir, esta pode se tornar alternativa mais custo-efetiva. .

OBJETIVO Evaluar el costo-efectividad de diferentes tratamientos medicamentosos para hepatitis B crónica entre pacientes adultos. MÉTODOS Utilizando el modelo de Markov, se construyó cohorte hipotética de 40 años para pacientes HBeAg-positivo o HBeAg-negativo. Se compararon los usos de adefovir, entecavir, tenofovir y lamivudina (con terapia de rescate en caso de resistencia viral) para tratamiento de pacientes adultos con hepatitis B crónica, vírgenes de tratamiento, con elevados niveles de alanina aminotransferasa, sin evidencia de cirrosis y sin coinfección por VIH. Valores para costo y efecto fueron obtenidos de la literatura y efecto en años de vida ganados (AVG). Tasa de descuento de 5% fue aplicada. Análisis de sensibilidad univariado fue conducido para evaluar incertidumbres del modelo. RESULTADOS El tratamiento inicial con entecavir o tenofovir presentó mejores resultados clínicos. Los menores cocientes costo-efectividad fueron de entecavir para pacientes HBeAg-positivo (R.010,84/AVG) y lamivudina para pacientes HBeAg-negativo (R.205,08/AVG).Para pacientes HBeAg-negativo, el cociente costo-efectividad incrementado de entecavir (R.101,05/AVG) está por debajo del límite recomendado por la Organización Mundial de la Salud. El análisis de sensibilidad mostró que la variación en los costos de los medicamentos puede tornar tenofovir una alternativa costo-efectiva tanto para pacientes HBeAg-positivo como para los HBeAg-negativo. CONCLUSIONES Entecavir es una alternativa recomendada para iniciar el tratamiento de pacientes con hepatitis B crónica en Brasil. Sin embargo, al haber reducción en el costo de tenofovir, éste puede convertirse en una alternativa más costo-efectiva. .

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different drug therapies for chronic hepatitis B in adult patients. METHODS Using a Markov model, a hypothetical cohort of 40 years for HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative patients was constructed. Adefovir, entecavir, tenofovir and lamivudine (with rescue therapy in cases of viral resistance) were compared for treating adult patients with chronic hepatitis B undergoing treatment for the first time, with high levels of alanine aminotransferase, no evidence of cirrhosis and without HIV co-infection. Values for cost and effect were obtained from the literature, and expressed in effect on life years (LY). A discount rate of 5% was applied. Univariate sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess model uncertainties. RESULTS Initial treatment with entecavir or tenofovir showed better clinical outcomes. The lowest cost-effectiveness ratio was for entecavir in HBeAg-positive patients (R$ 4,010.84/LY) and lamivudine for HBeAg-negative patients (R$ 6,205.08/LY). For HBeAg-negative patients, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of entecavir (R$ 14,101.05/LY) is below the threshold recommended by the World Health Organization. Sensitivity analysis showed that variation in the cost of drugs may make tenofovir a cost-effective alternative for both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS Entecavir is the recommended alternative to start treating patients with chronic hepatitis B in Brazil. However, if there is a reduction in the cost of tenofovir, it can become a cost-effective alternative. .

[Cost-effectiveness analysis of immunosuppressive drugs in post-renal transplantation maintenance therapy in adult patients in Brazil]. / Análise de custo-efetividade dos imunossupressores utilizados no tratamento de manutenção do transplante renal em pacientes adultos no Brasil.

The aim of the study was to perform cost-effectiveness analysis of immunosuppressive drugs in post-renal transplantation maintenance therapy. A hypothetical cohort of transplanted adults was followed for 20 years, using the Markov model. The 10 evaluated therapeutic regimens contained prednisone (P). Average cost of the medicines was obtained from CMED (Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamentos). Other patient care costs were included in each disease stage. Costs were expressed in Brazilian reais, effectiveness was measured as years of life gained, and the study adopted a public health system perspective. At the end of follow-up, the analysis with discount showed that all the regimens were dominated by cyclosporine (CSA)+azathioprine (AZA)+P. In the remaining analyses, tacrolimus+AZA+P was not dominated, but the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between these two regimens was R$ 156,732.07/ years of life gained, a value that exceeds the threshold of three times the Brazilian per capita GDP. In the sensitivity analysis, no qualitative change was observed and the probability of CSA+AZA+P being the most cost-effective regimen was greater than 85%.

Custo-efetividade dos análogos de nucleosídeos/nucleotídeos para hepatite crônica B / Cost-effectiveness of nucleoside/nucleotide analogues in chronic hepatitis B / Costo-efectividad de los análogos de nucleósidos/nucleótidos para hepatitis crónica B

.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of drug alternatives with rescue therapy in case of relapse due to viral resistance for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). METHODS: Hypothetical cohort of patients with CHB, HBeAg-negative, without clinical or histological evidence of cirrhosis, detectable HBV DNA, histological diagnosis of the disease, positive serum HBsAg for longer than six months, high levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (twice as high as the upper limit of normality) and mean age of 40 years. A Markov model was developed for chronic hepatitis B (HBeAg- negative) with a 40-year time horizon. Costs and benefits were discounted at 5%. Annual rates of disease progression, costs due to complications and the efficacy of medicines were obtained from the literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis evaluated uncertainties. RESULTS: Initiation of treatments with entecavir resulted in an increase of 0.35 discounted life-years gained compared to lamivudine. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was R$16,416.08 per life-years gained. In the sensitivity analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was more sensitive to variation in the probability of transition from chronic hepatitis B to compensated cirrhosis, discount rate and medicine prices (± 10%). In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the acceptability curve showed that beginning treatment with entecavir was the most cost-effective alternative in comparison with the use of lamivudine. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of entecavir is economically attractive as part of early treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis B without HIV co-infection.

.